Will the Defendant please rise...
What a shame!
We are going to be forced into watching the Michael Jackson Final Tour for four months.
Of course child molestation is the core of this trial, but we are going to get a spin-off show where we see the main character- a genius performer in childhood- psychologically unravel before our very eyes.
"The Michael Jackson Reality Hour is being brought to you by..." as Johnny's bulging eyes haven't yet gotten over his last cartoon appearance ("Why Johnny can't read....")
How could any parent allow a "Michael Jackson" become their child's liaison into adolescence in terms of what his personal history has been over 40 years? It's easy I suppose when no one in Hollywood has any sense of the reality we masses live. (Did your junior in high school take the SAT's today with the thought of getting into a college thus allowing a career in the future? Or will you be proud of a lifetime of Howard Stern or Paris Hilton antics? Oh what the hell- they make millions of dollars!)
His legal team has hundreds of stars ready to testify about his kindness and caring and every other altruistic nuance known to man, but do we really need to know what Liz Taylor has to say? I don't think so.
I did a month stint on a grand jury a few years back and was proud to be a part of the system that pre-considers the worthiness of taking a case to trial so as to not waste taxpayers' funds on frivolous state lawsuits. At the end of this travesty we are going to be seeing how the "bartender" served Jesus Juice to an underaged victim who led police to a secreted room where "rites of passage" where explained to him by someone totally unqualified. Of course the child's parents will be displayed as being irresponsible kooks who live on the outcome of lawsuits...
After everyone is dragged through the mud, it will still be wrong to (have a stranger) intoxicate a child for any reason, and particularly when he is subsequently coerced into observing or performing sexual acts that have been deemed harmful by psychologists and applied to our general laws.
Why does it take four months to re-learn this lesson when it involves a rich Hollywood icon? The answer is usually built into the question, isn't it?
We are going to be forced into watching the Michael Jackson Final Tour for four months.
Of course child molestation is the core of this trial, but we are going to get a spin-off show where we see the main character- a genius performer in childhood- psychologically unravel before our very eyes.
"The Michael Jackson Reality Hour is being brought to you by..." as Johnny's bulging eyes haven't yet gotten over his last cartoon appearance ("Why Johnny can't read....")
How could any parent allow a "Michael Jackson" become their child's liaison into adolescence in terms of what his personal history has been over 40 years? It's easy I suppose when no one in Hollywood has any sense of the reality we masses live. (Did your junior in high school take the SAT's today with the thought of getting into a college thus allowing a career in the future? Or will you be proud of a lifetime of Howard Stern or Paris Hilton antics? Oh what the hell- they make millions of dollars!)
His legal team has hundreds of stars ready to testify about his kindness and caring and every other altruistic nuance known to man, but do we really need to know what Liz Taylor has to say? I don't think so.
I did a month stint on a grand jury a few years back and was proud to be a part of the system that pre-considers the worthiness of taking a case to trial so as to not waste taxpayers' funds on frivolous state lawsuits. At the end of this travesty we are going to be seeing how the "bartender" served Jesus Juice to an underaged victim who led police to a secreted room where "rites of passage" where explained to him by someone totally unqualified. Of course the child's parents will be displayed as being irresponsible kooks who live on the outcome of lawsuits...
After everyone is dragged through the mud, it will still be wrong to (have a stranger) intoxicate a child for any reason, and particularly when he is subsequently coerced into observing or performing sexual acts that have been deemed harmful by psychologists and applied to our general laws.
Why does it take four months to re-learn this lesson when it involves a rich Hollywood icon? The answer is usually built into the question, isn't it?
posted by Doc AWM at 3:15 PM
3 Comments:
Today's Michael Jackson news is of his being near bankruptcy; guess we did learn something from the OJ trial heh?
As Johnny C would say:
"When you do a crime, dissolve assets in time."
Post more!!!!! LOL (A)
Update- MJ is happy in the state of Bahaaran (sp?) where he has a new fantasy palace. As predicted he was never going bankrupt- he was just transferring tons of money to a fund for his new digs.
Post a Comment
<< Home